Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Harclaon

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1960No. 34913PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Per curiam

— This is an appeal from a judgment based upon an award of the jury in a condemnation action. Appellant’s attorney at the trial did not represent him on appeal.

*597.Appellant assigns error to the court’s instructions Nos. 5, 8, 10, and additional instruction No. 2. No exceptions were taken to any of the court’s instructions, and they became the law of the case. Holmes v. Toothaker, 52 Wn. (2d) 574, 328 P. (2d) 146 (1958).

Appellant next assigns error to alleged misconduct of the trial judge in participating in the questioning of the •expert witnesses by asking leading questions, and questions…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Shoemaker v. Bryant Lumber & Shingle Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Weinrob v. HeintzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952
  4. Holmes v. ToothakerWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Lee & Eastes, Inc. v. Continental Carriers, Ltd.Washington Supreme Court · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. O'HaraWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. WickeWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Egede-Nissen v. Crystal Mountain, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. CoxWashington Supreme Court · 1988

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API