Legal Opinion

Conger v. Thomas & Lane

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1932No. Docket No. 63, Calendar No. 36,396PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiff filed her bill of complaint in the Wayne county circuit court in chancery to rescind a land contract on the ground of fraud and for ancillary relief. Prom a decree for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

The defendants Thomas & Lane are copartners, and were engaged in subdividing and selling real estate in Windsor, Ontario, prior to the time the Ambassador bridge opened, seeking to take advantage of the inflation of prices incident to the building and opening of the international bridge across Detroit river. It is claimed plaintiff had no experience in real estate, and defendants Thomas &…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Picard v. McCormickMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Maxted v. FowlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Steele v. BanningaMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Peck v. JenisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Pinch v. HotalingMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gower v. WieserMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Szarkowski v. PfisterMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Cohn v. KramerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API