Legal Opinion

Wade v. Six Park View Corp.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 2, 1953PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

27 N.J. Super. 469 (1953)

99 A.2d 589

MARY P. WADE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

SIX PARK VIEW CORP., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 28, 1953.

Decided October 2, 1953.

Before Judges CLAPP, GOLDMANN and EWART.

Mr. Weidner Titzck argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Mr. Joseph Pierce Lodge, attorney).

Mr. Samuel P. Orlando argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Messrs. Orlando, Devine & Tomlin, attorneys).

2Per curiam

The judgment appealed from is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Palese reported at 25 N.J. Super. 433 (Cty. Ct. 1953).

T…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kirshenbaum v. General Outdoor Advertising Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Wade v. Park View Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  3. In RE APPLICATION OF DeVITASupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  4. Sun Copper and Wire Co. v. White Lamps, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kuzmiak v. BrookchesterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  2. Fleming Companies, Inc. v. Thriftway Medford Lakes, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
  3. Midland Carpet Corp. v. Franklin Associated PropertiesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  4. Swisscraft Novelty Co. v. Alad Realty Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  5. Freddi-Gail, Inc. v. Royal Holding Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API