Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Rapp

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 1978No. 81PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge:

This appeal arises from a conviction of violation of Section 6105 of the Pennsylvania Uniform Firearms Act 1 which prohibits a person convicted of a violent crime from possessing a firearm. Appellant contends his conviction cannot stand in view of the Commonwealth’s failure to prove the length of the barrel of the subject weapon. We agree and reverse. 2

It is readily apparent that the Commonwealth failed to prove its case. Although Section 6105, supra, provides:

“No person who has been convicted in this Commonwealth or elsewhere of a crime of violence shall own a firearm, or have…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PopeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. RomanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. KeysockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. AmbroseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JenningsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. FitzhughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. WestSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. JerrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Carlson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API