Commonwealth v. Rapp
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CERCONE, Judge:
This appeal arises from a conviction of violation of Section 6105 of the Pennsylvania Uniform Firearms Act 1 which prohibits a person convicted of a violent crime from possessing a firearm. Appellant contends his conviction cannot stand in view of the Commonwealth’s failure to prove the length of the barrel of the subject weapon. We agree and reverse. 2
It is readily apparent that the Commonwealth failed to prove its case. Although Section 6105, supra, provides:
“No person who has been convicted in this Commonwealth or elsewhere of a crime of violence shall own a firearm, or have…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PopeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. RomanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. KeysockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. AmbroseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JenningsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. FitzhughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. WestSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. JerrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Carlson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.