Legal Opinion
Holst v. KCI Konecranes International Corp.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided September 8, 2010No. 4736PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLockemy, J.
Jean Holst argues the circuit court erred in granting KCI Konecranes International Corporation a/k/a Konecranes, Inc. and KCI Special Cranes Corporation f/k/a KCI Konecranes VLC’s (collectively, KCI) motion for summary judgment. Specifically, she maintains the circuit court erred in (1) improperly weighing evidence; (2) applying the improper legal standard regarding the role of industry custom; (3) applying legal standards from Sexton By & Through Sexton v. Bell Helmets, Inc., 926 F.2d 331 (4th Cir.1991), Marchant v. Mitchell Distributing Co., 270 S.C. 29, 240 S.E.2d 511 (1977), and Bragg v.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bragg v. Hi-Ranger, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
- United States v. David P. BowmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Marchant v. Mitchell Distributing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
- Livingston v. Noland Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- Bray v. Marathon Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sauls v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2012
- Lawing v. Trinity Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
- Holland ex rel. Knox v. Morbark, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
- Commissioners of Public Works of the City of Charleston v. Costco Wholesale CorporationDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021