Legal Opinion
Bragg v. Hi-Ranger, Inc.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided September 18, 1995No. 2393PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CURETON, Judge:
This is a products liability case. Betty Bragg, as the personal representative of the Estate of James Robert Bragg (collectively referred to as “Bragg”), brought this action against the manufacturer of an aerial device, Hi-Ranger, Inc. (Hi-Ranger), and the distributor of the aerial device, Power Equipment Company, alleging claims based upon strict liability, implied warranties, and negligence. Hi-Ranger filed a general denial to the action and put forth the following defenses: (1) contributory negligence, (2) assumption of the risk, (3) intervening negligence, (4) substantial…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Davis v. Globe MacHine Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
- Bilotta v. Kelley Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Mickle v. BlackmonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
- Goodbar v. Whitehead Bros.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Tabieros v. Clark Equipment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1997
- Small v. Pioneer MacHinery, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
- Keaton Ex Rel. Foster v. GREENVILLE HOSP.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Branham v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- Rife v. Hitachi Const. MacHinery Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.