Legal Opinion
Young v. Ridley
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 11, 1970No. Civ. A. 387-70PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM — ORDER
GASCH, District Judge.
The question before the Court is whether a three-judge court must be convened. Plaintiffs in this case seek a declaratory judgment that the procedure for extrajudicial foreclosure “authorized” by Title 45, Sections 301, 603 and 615 of the District of Columbia Code is unconstitutional because it deprives homeowners of property without due process of law. In addition, they have moved for a preliminary injunction to restrain the defendants from proceeding with completion of a foreclosure sale under a deed executed by plaintiffs pending full hearing on…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- California Water Service Co. v. City of ReddingSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Nelson v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Joseph A. Bryant v. Jefferson Federal Savings and Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- McCormick v. First National Bank of MiamiDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1971
- Black Watch Farms, Inc. v. DickDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1971
- Bank-Fund Staff Federal Credit Union v. CuellarDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.