Rasmussen v. City of Lake Forest, Illinois
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FLAUM, District Judge.
Plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of certain zoning ordinances of the City of Lake Forest. The defendants have moved to strike and dismiss the complaint. For the reasons stated below, the motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
Taking as true the well pleaded allegations of the complaint, the following fact situation is before the court. Because of rising taxes and costs, it is claimed that it is no longer profitable for Robert Rasmussen to sell or to continue to use his land as a farm. The defendant City of Lake Forest, in which the…
2Cases cited78 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Parkway Bank & Trust v. City of DarienAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- Meyer v. NILES TP., ILL.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
- Hopson v. SchillingDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1976
- Owen v. City of Independence, Mo.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1976
- Kelly v. SilverCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.