Sumlin v. Krehbiel
District Court, E.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
876 F.Supp. 1080 (1994)
Rufus SUMLIN, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
Robert KREHBIEL, et al., Defendants.
No. 4:93CV02047 GFG.
United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division.
December 14, 1994.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John R. Munich, Chief Counsel, Litigation Div., David A. Johnston, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for defendants.
MEMORANDUM
GUNN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the pending motions. After a review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the claims raised in this case are barred and subject to dismissal under the doctrine of res…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Martha POE, Appellant, v. JOHN DEERE COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Lane v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Headley v. BaconCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McNamara v. Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2019