Legal Opinion

Seismograph Service Corporation v. Buchanan

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 14, 1957No. 37562PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

In August, 1954, plaintiff in error, defendant below, was conducting seismograph exploration operations in the vicinity of the home of the defendants in error, plaintiffs below, on behalf of a corporation owning leases in that area. Further reference to the parties will be by their trial court designation. Plaintiffs’ evidence, in substance, was that on a day when they were both at home, they became aware of the defendant’s operations by reason of an explosion which they heard and felt; that approximately four minutes later a second explosion occurred, equally as strong as the first, both of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Patrick v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. City of Muskogee v. HancockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Deardorf v. RosenbuschSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  4. British-American Oil Producing Co. v. McClainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. City of Oklahoma City v. HokeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Wetsel v. Independent School District I-1Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  2. Garland Coal & Mining Co. v. FewCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
  3. States Exploration Company v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  4. Gayle Ward v. H. B. Zachry Const. CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  5. Young v. DarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API