Legal Opinion

Burnham Bros. Brick Co. v. Riesen

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.

The order dismissing the cause for want of prosecution, it then having been pending more than three terms in the circuit court, was a then proper disposition of the cause under the rules of said court. That the order of dismissal was not followed by formal order in writing or by a judgment of dismissal is, under the situation in this case, immaterial. The direction from the bench for a dismissal was the action of the court, was complete, *528definite, final, and sufficient. Allen v. Voje, 114 Wis. 1, 8, 89 N. W. 924; Wallis v. First Nat. Bank, 155 Wis. 533, 537, 538, 145 N. W. 195; Wehr v. Gimbel…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Allen v. VojeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Wallis v. First National Bank of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Will of Burghardt v. BurghardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Wawrzyniakowski v. Hoffman & Billings Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Wehr v. Gimbel Bros.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Werner v. RiemerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Zrimsek v. American Automobile Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Hargraves v. HoffmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API