Legal Opinion

Stanford v. Cudd

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 10, 1913No. 8410PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Before Gage, J., Spartanburg, Action by D. T. P. Stanford against J. N. Cudd in court of magistrate A. H. Kirby. From order on Circuit affirming magistrate judgment, defendant appeals,

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Hydricic.

Plaintiff sued defendant in the court of a magistrate to recover $80, the value of some advertising signs, ordered by S. E. True, for the advertisement of True’s Department Store. Plaintiff sought to- hold defendant liable on the ground that he was the owner of True’s Department Store, and that True was his agent in the management of the business. The case was tried before the magistrate and a jury, and the jury found for plaintiff, whereupon, defendant appealed to the Circuit Court. On hearing the appeal, the Court affirmed the…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bushardt v. United Investment Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  2. Burns v. WannamakerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Hadfield v. GilchristCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  4. Miller v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
  5. Holden v. CantrellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API