Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Williams
District Court, D. Kansas
In Equity. On demurrer to bill.
1Opinion of the Court
POLLOCK, District Judge.
The bill of complaint in this case avers complainant, in the operation of its road at the station of Rexford, Thomas county, this state, to be the owner and to maintain a depot, depot platform, main line, siding, passing tracks, station grounds, buildings, and other improvements, all acquired by it under the laws of the state, and all necessary for the transaction of its business as a common carrier for hire.
The bill further avers that defendants, acting under the authority of the county board of Thomas county, have laid out and are about to open for travel a highway…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Shoemaker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Backus v. Fort Street Union Depot Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Matter of City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- The Albany Northern Railroad Company v. . BrownellNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Clarke v. BoysenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- City of Norton v. LowdenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. Incorporated Town of Lost NationDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1916
- St. Louis & S. F. R. v. City of TulsaDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1914
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Sevier CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.