St. Louis & S. F. R. v. City of Tulsa
District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
In Equity. Suit by the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company and others against the City of Tulsa and others. On motion for preliminary injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
The question now presented arises upon application of the plaintiffs for a temporary injunction pending final decree to prevent the defendants from proceeding in the state court to condemn that portion of plaintiffs’ right of way which would fall within the lines of Frankfort avenue'in the city of Tulsa if the same were extended across the plaintiffs’ right of way.
By resolution of its commissioners, the city of Tulsa has provided for the extension of Frankfort avenue over plaintiffs’ right of way and has directed its attorney to institute condemnation proceedings in…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Matter of City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- The Albany Northern Railroad Company v. . BrownellNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Matter of Boston and Albany R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
- City of Fort Wayne v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1892
- In Re Rochester Water Commissioners to Acquire Lands of Rochester Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Norton v. LowdenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. Incorporated Town of Lost NationDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1916
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Sevier CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Sevier CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926