Legal Opinion

LeMoyne v. Neal

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 4, 1916PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Whitley Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Oouet by

Judpe Huet

— Affirming.

Tlie appellants, John Y. LeMoyne and two others associated with him, alleging that they were the owners and entitled to the possession of a very large tract of land in Whitley county, and that appellee, J. J. Neal, was wrongfully in possession and holding a portion of it against them, and had trespassed upon other portions of it by cutting and converting to his own use timber trees, which grew upon the lands,. instituted this suit and sought the recovery of the possession of that portion which appellee had in his .possession, and damages for the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. QuinnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1893
  2. Turner v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  3. LeMoyne v. NealCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  4. Read v. GilliamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  5. Bates v. PigmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Swift Coal Timber Company v. IsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  2. Morton v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  3. Pioneer Coal Company v. Asher, Sr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  4. Moore v. BrandenburgCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  5. Carpenter v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API