Hardin v. State Bank of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Ring county, Brinker, J., entered May 14, 1921, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in consolidated actions in replevin and to foreclose a chattel mortgage, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
— Respondent, claiming to be the owner and entitled to the immediate possession of one certain Jordan touring car, No. 11,457, brought an action in the nature of a replevin to recover the possession thereof from appellant. Appellant answered, denying the material allegations of the complaint, and pleading affirmatively that it had a- chattel mortgage on the car, duly executed and filed for record, and that it had taken, and then held, possession of the car by virtue of such mortgage. Thereafter appellant brought an action to foreclose its mortgage, alleging the necessary facts as to the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Boice v. Finance & Guaranty Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1920
- Keyes v. SabinWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Miller v. ScarbroughWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- O'Neil v. CheatwoodSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. EtzlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Gramm-Bernstein Motor Truck Co. v. ToddWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Martin v. Duncan Automobile Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1927
- In re MillerDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1923