Legal Opinion

Martin v. Duncan Automobile Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1927No. 2737PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Sanders, C. J.:

These appeals are taken from an order appointing a receiver pendente lite, which order directed the receiver to take possession of four particularly described Nash automobiles, each covered by a chattel mortgage which the mortgagee seeks by this action to have foreclosed. The matter of the appointment of the receiver came before the trial court upon the hearing of an order to show cause why such receiver should not be appointed.

The respondent, plaintiff below, has moved the dismissal of the appeals, particularly the appeal of the intervener, because of lack…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boice v. Finance & Guaranty Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  2. Luther v. LeeMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  3. National City Bank v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  4. Pratt v. MaynardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  5. Hardin v. State Bank of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Daas v. Contract Purchase Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Gernazian v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  3. First Security Bank v. Zaring Farm & Livestock Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Martin v. Duncan Automobile Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API