Legal Opinion
P-S-H
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2014No. ID 3805PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
26 I&N Dec. 329
(BIA 2014) Interim Decision #3805 Matter of P-S-H-, Respondent Decided July 1, 2014 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals To terminate a grant of asylum pursuant to
8 C.F.R. § 1208.24
(2013), the Department of Homeland Security must establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, that (1) there was fraud in the alien’s asylum application and (2) the fraud was such that the alien was not eligible for asylum at the time it was granted; however, proof that the alien knew of the fraud in the application is not required…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rahewa Yeimane-Berhe v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Genet Hailemichael v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Forbes v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- TIJAMBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1998
- Nijjar v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Elen Grigoryan v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Buddha Lo v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- X-Q-LBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2019