Legal Opinion

Nijjar v. Holder

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 1, 2012No. 07-74054, 08-70933PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLEINFELD, Senior Circuit Judge:

We address whether the Department of Homeland Security has authority to terminate an alien’s asylum status, and conclude that it does not. The issue arises out of structural changes to our immigration system made when the Department of Homeland Security assumed functions of the Immigration and Naturalization Service.

I

Petitioners, Gurjeet Singh Nijjar and his wife, Paramjit Kaur Nijjar, are natives and citizens of India. Mr. Nijjar applied for asylum in 1995, based on political persecution he claimed to have suffered in India from 1991 to 1994, on account…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. Elen Grigoryan v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. E. Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. TrumpDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
  5. A-S-JBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API