Legal Opinion
TIJAM
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1998No. ID 3372PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #3372 In re Lumen Berina TIJAM, Respondent File 41 236 021 - Los Angeles Decided December 10, 1998 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) In making the discretionary determination on a waiver of deportability pursuant to sec- tion 241(a)(1)(H) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1251(a)(1)(H) (1994), an Immigration Judge should consider the alien’s initial fraud or misrepresentation in the overall assessment of positive and negative factors. (2) The Board of Immigration Appeals declines to follow the…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Kungys v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Fedorenko v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Genet Hailemichael v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Vasquez v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Parlak v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- CASTILLO-PADILLABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2010
- Elen Grigoryan v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.