Legal Opinion

People v. Rodriguez Alaniz

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 20, 1993No. F017404PublishedCited by 3 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THAXTER, J.

This case presents the question of when, and by which court, the two-year on-bail enhancement provided for in Penal Code 1 section 12022.1 should be imposed under the circumstances described in subdivision (d) 2 of that statute, i.e., when the defendant has reoffended (i.e., committed a “secondary” offense) while on bail or own-recognizance release on charges stemming ffdm a previous (i.e., “primary”) offense, and sentencing on the secondary offense precedes sentencing on the primary offense.

Procedural History

On October 15, 1990, a criminal complaint was filed in the Fresno…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. McClanahanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Leffel v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. People v. WhigamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. People v. BariesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Panos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. MeloneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Gowan v. Stryker CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
  3. People v. MeloneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API