Legal Opinion
Walker v. City of Waterbury
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 1, 2007No. 06-2011-cvPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiffs-Appellants appeal from the April 20, 2006, final judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Kravitz, J.), dismissing their claims for failure to join a necessary and indispensable party.
We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history, and the issues presented for review. In brief, Plaintiffs, firefighters employed by the City of Waterbury (the “City”), brought claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City, alleging that actions taken by the City affecting Plaintiffs’ pension benefits deprived…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Regents of University of California v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Hess v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Woods v. Rondout Valley Central School District Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Envirotech Corporation and Chemico Air Pollution Control Corp. v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation, and Envirotech Corporation, on Counterclaim-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- School Administrators v. Waterbury Financial Planning & Assistance BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Tiraco v. New York State Board of ElectionsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Leitner v. Westchester Community CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Lewis v. Roosevelt Island Operating Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Errico v. Stryker Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Walker v. City of WaterburyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.