Legal Opinion

Officer v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 5, 1923No. 10,416PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Teller

This cause presents the question of the right of an accident insurance company, when sued on one of its policies providing for death benefits, to make suicide a defense, in the face of our statute prohibiting such defense.

The defendant relied upon the following provision in the policy: “4. If while insane the assured shall inflict upon himself, or receive injuries fatal or otherwise, or while sane *218shall intentionally inflict upon himself injuries fatal or otherwise, the measure of this company’s liability shall be a sum equal to the last premium paid, the same being agreed upon as in full…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Accident Insurance v. CrandalSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Brunswick v. Standard Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
  3. Head Camp Woodmen of the World v. SlossSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  4. Midland Casualty Co. v. FrameSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  5. Union Health & Accident Co. v. WelchSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of California v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
  2. Carter v. Standard Acc. Ins.Utah Supreme Court · 1925
  3. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. OfficerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  4. Business Men's Assur. Co. v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  5. Capitol Life Insurance v. Di IulloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API