Legal Opinion

Capitol Life Insurance v. Di Iullo

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 23, 1935No. 13,778PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Butler

On November 21, 1925, the Capitol Life Insurance Company issued a policy on the life of Carlo Di Iullo for $5,000. Attached to the policy and made a part thereof was a double indemnity provision, whereby, so far as pertinent here, the company agreed to pay an additional $5,000 “in event that the death of the insured hereunder results directly and independently of all other causes from bodily injury effected solely through external, violent and accidental cause, and that such death occur within sixty days after sustaining such injury.” It provided that the double indemnity benefit “will not…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Whitfield v. Aetna Life Ins. Co. of HartfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Brunswick v. Standard Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
  3. Logan v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  4. Aufrichtig v. Columbia National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  5. Andrus v. Business Men's Accident Ass'n of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Downey v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  2. Insurance Co. of North America v. AufenkampCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  3. McCowan v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  4. City of Aurora v. Congregation Beth Medrosh HagodolSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  5. Occidental Life Insurance v. United States National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API