Legal Opinion

Rich v. United States

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 20, 1893PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal trom the District Court of Oklahoma Coimty, lion. John G. Clark, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of rhe court was delivered by

Green, C. J.:

— The appellant was prosecuted in the district court of Oklahoma county for the crime of perjury, alleged to have been committed in the local land office, on the trial of a land contest before the register and receiver, wherein John H. Engbring was contestant and Lemuel A. Perry was contestee. On the trial in the district court, before the court and a jury, the appellant was found guilty as charged in the indictment; and a motion for a new trial and in arrest of judgment was overruled; and, by the judgment of the court, appellant was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pettibone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. United States v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Pankey v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1833
  4. State v. AikensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. BixbyWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. State v. SwisherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  3. State v. IngelsWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Cutler v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  5. Cornelson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API