Legal Opinion

Cutler v. Territory of Oklahoma

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 11, 1899PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error from the District OouH cf Patonee County; lefare A. G. C. Bierer, District Judge. O. S. Cutler was convicted of perjury, and appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Burford, C. J.:

The plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of perjury, and sentenced to a term of ten years’ imprisonment. He prosecuted this appeal to re-' verse that judgment. There are a number of assignments of error, but we need notice only two, as all are embraced in these two, viz. the court erred in overruling the demurrer to the indictment, and that the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

We have examined the indictment, and find that it contains all the material averments necessary to constitute a good- charge of perjury, and that no…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. People v. Von TiedemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  4. Campell v. PeopleNew York Supreme Court · 1832
  5. Stanley v. United StatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1893

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Harmon v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  2. Pilgrim v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. State v. PrattSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Davis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Cornelson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API