Kornegay v. . Goldsboro
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, C. J., and BROWN, J., dissenting. This is an action to restrain the sale of certain municipal bonds, the plaintiff alleging that the act of the General Assembly authorizing the sale of the bonds is unconstitutional and void.
The important and material facts involved in this controversy are:
1. That the city of Goldsboro, being indebted for public improvements, prepared to issue bonds under the Municipal Finance Act for sale in order that the proceeds might be used to pay said indebtedness, which consists of $150,000 in favor of the Equitable Trust Company of New York, by notes dated 2…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. TynenSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- McLean v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Rodgers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Dahnke v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- State ex rel. Webster v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. LaundyOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- McIntyre v. ClarksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- In Re: Joseph Lee MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Hobbs v. County of MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State Highway Commission v. HemphillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.