Legal Opinion
State v. Assuntino
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 17, 1977PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLoiselle, J.
The defendants were charged with professional gambling and with using a telephone facility to transmit or receive gambling information. The charges were dismissed by the Court of Common Pleas. The state claims that the dismissals were due to an erroneous interpretation of a statute, and that there is a division among the geographical areas of the Court of Common Pleas regarding the interpretation of this statute. At the present time the state has no right of appeal in a criminal case from the Court of Common Pleas to the Appellate Session of the Superior Court. State v. Falzone, 171 Conn.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Willoughby v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- State v. CaplanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- State v. MuoloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Connecticut Chiropody Society, Inc. v. MurraySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Brown v. CraySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Valeriano v. BronsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Cannavo Enterprises, Inc. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. McCahillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Banks v. ThomasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. AssuntinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.