Legal Opinion
State v. Muolo
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 1, 1934PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The Assistant City Attorney of the City Court of New Haven informed against the defendant in error, charging him with the violation of an order of the board of police commissioners of the city acting as a traffic commission under § 56b of the General Statutes, Cum. Sup. 1933. The defendant demurred to the information as insufficient in law, and the court sustained the demurrer upon the ground that the statute under which the order was issued was unconstitutional. Thereafter it caused judgment to be issued acquitting the defendant, but not discharging him, so that he remained under bail,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. SangesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
- Beardsley v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1883
- United States v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Graham v. WalkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Pueblo v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1960
- State v. NardiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Moore v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Kohlfuss v. Warden of Connecticut State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.