Legal Opinion

Estate of Bailey

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 21, 1941No. Civ. 2616PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

Harvey E. Bailey, Sr., was the owner of a parcel of real property subject to an indebtedness secured by a trust deed on which he was personally liable. He agreed, in writing, to sell the property to Delya Linstrum, agreeing to pay off this incumbrance in accordance with the terms of the trust deed and then to convey the property to her. After his death the full amount of the incumbrance became due under the terms of the trust deed. Mrs. Linstrum, having fully performed her part of the contract, filed a petition asking that the executor of Bailey’s estate be directed to pay off the trust deed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Newport v. HattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Estate of Dutard v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Mix v. YoakumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Fulmer v. Pacific Southwest Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Porter v. Van DenburghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bewick v. MechamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Erickson v. BootheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Speck v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Mossman v. HAW'N TR. CO., LIMITEDHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
  5. O'Donnell v. LutterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API