Dailey v. Bond
Supreme Court of Vermont
Complaint for bastardy. Trial by jury at the June Term, 1919, Orange County, Moulton, J.,- presiding. Yerdiet and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted. The defendant brought a petitio'n to the Supreme Court for a new trial, which was heard with his exceptions. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtSlack, J.
During the trial certain evidence was admitted, subject to the defendant’s exception, and later, at his request, it was withdrawn from the consideration of the jury. The exception to the admission of such evidence is not relied upon; but, *304after verdict and judgment against him, the defendant brought a petition to the county court asking that the verdict be set aside and a new trial granted him, because the court failed to instruct the jurors, either at the time such evidence was withdrawn from their consideration, or in its charge, not to consider the samej and because they did not know that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Luther Baker & Sons v. ShermanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1899
- Downer v. BaxterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1857
- Marcy v. ParkerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1905
3Cited by14 opinions
- Packard v. QuesnelSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
- Shields v. Vermont Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
- State v. OrlandiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
- Gero v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
- Bellows Falls Village Corp. v. State Highway BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.