Town of Mount Olive v. Price
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, Judge.
The defendant has appealed on the grounds that there was no evidence to support the finding by the trial court on 29 January 1973 and 7 May 1973 that the defendant was in violation of a zoning ordinance. The gist of his argument is that there was no violation of the ordinance because there was no valid zoning ordinance at the time in question. However, a zoning ordinance is presumed to be valid and the burden is on the party alleging invalidity to prove that the ordinance is unreasonable and arbitrary. Orange County v. Heath, 278 N.C. 688, 180 S.E. 2d 810 (1971); Gastonia v.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re the Sale of Land of WarrickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
- Cobb v. CobbCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- City of Gastonia v. ParrishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Orange County v. HeathSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States Leasing Corp. v. Everett, Creech, Hancock & HerzigCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Indiana Lumbermen's Mutual Insurance v. ChampionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Nytco Leasing, Inc. v. Dan-Cleve Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- Webb v. JamesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.