Legal Opinion

City of Gastonia v. Parrish

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 11, 1967No. 209PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPless, J.

In order to prevail, plaintiff must first show that the zoning ordinance of 5 January 1965 was legally adopted by the Gastonia City Council and that it is valid. Taken in the light most favorable to it, it has offered evidence which tends to show:

That the ordinance (Plaintiff’s Exhibit A) was unanimously adopted by the Council 5 January 1965, which was later printed in book form and was certified by the City Clerk;

The ordinance made a map showing the zoned territory a part of it;

The above map has been lost and cannot, after due and diligent search, be found;

A map made by a tracing process…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Helms v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. City of Raleigh v. MorandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. McKay v. . BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. North Carolina State Bar v. FrazierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Etheridge v. WescottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Investors Title Insurance v. HerzigSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Sherrill v. Town of Wrightsville BeachCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Town of Hillsborough v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  5. Town of Mount Olive v. PriceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API