F.J. Joseph, Inc. v. Lida Advertising, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment (Doc. #52) filed February 9, 1998. Defendant argues that plaintiffs claims are barred by the applicable two-year statute of limitations governing tort actions and also argues that it owed no legal duty to plaintiff. For the following reasons, the Court finds that defendant’s motion should be sustained in part and overruled in part.
Summary Judgment Standards
Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure directs the entry of summary judgment in favor of the party who…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Belinda MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NANNIE AND THE NEWBORNS, INC.; Business Solutions, Inc.; Larry D. Gudgel, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Muck v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Employers Reinsurance Corp. v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2002
- SG Metals Industries, Inc. v. New England Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
- Employers Reinsurance Corp. v. Jefferson Pilot Financial InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2001