Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bing Sial Liang

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 15, 2001PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCowin, J.

In this case we consider whether a judge may order the Commonwealth to disclose to a defendant the notes of a *132victim-witness advocate (advocate) based on the advocate’s conversations with a victim or witness concerning the investigation or prosecution at issue.1 We conclude that the notes of advocates are subject to the same discovery rules as the notes of prosecutors. To the extent that the notes contain material, exculpatory information, Mass. R. Crim. P. 14 (a) (1) (C), 378 Mass. 874 (1979), or relevant “statements” of a victim or witness, as defined in Mass. R. Crim. P. 14 (d), 378 Mass.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. PaszkoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Clerk-Magistrate of the West Roxbury Division of the District Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  3. State v. Patrick J. LynchWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  4. In re a Grand Jury InvestigationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  5. In re the Enforcement of a SubpoenaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API