In re the Enforcement of a Subpoena
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCordy, J.
In this case we conclude that although holding judges accountable for acts of bias in contravention of the Code of Judicial Conduct is essential, it must be accomplished without violating the protection afforded the deliberative processes of judges fundamental to ensuring that they may act without fear or favor in exercising their constitutional responsibility to be both impartial and independent. In so concluding, we formally recognize a judicial deliberative privilege that guards against intrusions into such processes — a protection we have implicitly understood as necessary to the…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Fayerweather v. RitchSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Washington v. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Office of Citizens' Aide/Ombudsman v. Deb Edwards and Iowa Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- Kosiorek v. SmigelskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Pacheco v. HudsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
- Pacheco v. HudsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
- Commonwealth v. AlmonteMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.