Legal Opinion

Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Co. v. Hanson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1892PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Grand Forks County; Templeton, J. Action by the Minnesota Threshing Manufacturing Company against Elias Hanson. Plaintiff had judgment, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBartholomew, J.

This action was brought to forclose a mortgage given to secure the purchase price of a steam threshing outfit. .The defense was breach of warranty, followed by a rescission of the contract and a return of the property. From a decree of foreclosure, with judgment for deficiency against him, defendant appeals. The findings of fact are not questioned, but the legal conclusions are challenged. The property purchased was second *82hand machinery. The order for the same, given by appellant, was upon a written and printed forrri, and contained the warranty upon which the breach is assigned. The…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Muller v. . EnoNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  2. Boothby v. ScalesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Polhemus v. HeimanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Locke v. WilliamsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Kellogg v. DenslowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1841

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jacot v. Grossmann Seed & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1913
  2. James v. BekkedahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Austin Co. v. Tillman Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Gould Balance Valve Co. v. HeroldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Peabody v. Lloyds BankersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API