Jacot v. Grossmann Seed & Supply Co.
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Hustings Court of the city" of Petersburg in a proceeding by motion tor a judgment for money. Judgment for the defendant. Plaintiff assigns error.
1Opinion of the Court
Keith, P.,
delivered the opinion of the court.
William Jacot, trading as Jacot & Mullen, made a motion for judgment in the hustings court of the city of Petersburg against the Grossmann Seed and Supply Company, Inc., to which the defendant pleaded the general issue and four special pleas, in the first of which it is alleged that the defendant had purchased of the plaintiff a quantity of crimson clover seed, which the plaintiff undertook and promised the defendant should be good merchantable seed, which proved not to be true, and that the clover seed were sterile and utterly worthless, to the dam*99…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Zabriskie v. . C.V.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Holloway v. JacobySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
- Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Co. v. HansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by7 opinions
- Holz v. Coates Motor Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1966
- Latham v. PowellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
- Wharton, Aldhizer & Weaver v. Savin Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1986
- Landreth Seed Co. v. Kerlec Seed Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
- Newbern v. Joseph Baker & Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.