Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Austin Co. v. Tillman Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1922Published

1Concurrence

BEAN, J.,

Concurring. — To the plaintiff’s suit for the sum of $7,233.25 for the purchase price of one Austin portable asphalt mixing plant after deducting $1,466.75, which defendant paid as freight, the defendant, after denying many allegations of the complaint, pleads in effect that the mixing plant ordered by defendant from plaintiff did not correspond with the one described in the order, and in the catalogue of plaintiff (pages 32 and 33) referred to in the order; that the plant was shipped from Chicago, Hlinois, and defendant had no opportunity to inspect the *560same; that it was received at…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. DutcherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. Norton v. . DreyfussNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Feeney & Bremer Co. v. StoneOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Hayes v. City of NashvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
  5. Kimball & Austin Manufacturing Co. v. VromanMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API