Legal Opinion

Scott v. Waples-Painter Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 30, 1918No. 8852PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from County Court, Murray County; J. H. Casteel, Judge. Suit b.y the Waples-Painter Company against William J. Scott, with garnishment upon the Bank of Commerce of Sulphur and (he Oklahoma State Bank of Davis, with answer and cross-petition by defendant. Demurrer to paragraph and answer sustained, and judgment against defendant, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

HOOKER, C.

The Waples-Painter Company filed a suit in the lower court to recover a judgment upon a promissory note made and delivered to it by the plaintiff in error, and after the institution of said action it filed bond and affidavit for garnishment against Scott, and caused garnishment summons to issue and to be served upon the Bank of Commerce of Sulphur and the Oklahoma State Bank of Davis. The affidavit in garnishment is as follows :

“W. E. Latimer, being duly sworn, says that he is atty & agent of the plaintiff in the above entitled cause; that the above named defendant William…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ed Hockaday & Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. P. Cox Manufacturing Co. v. AugustSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nation v. SavelySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Andrew Brown Company v. Painters Warehouse, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  3. Farmers State Bank of Newkirk v. HessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Schuman v. McLainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Brockhaus v. KilloughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API