Legal Opinion

Brockhaus v. Killough

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 6, 1923No. 12264PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JONES, C.

This action was instituted in district court of Woodward county by plaintiff in error, as plaintiff, against defendant in error, as defendant, for rents due plaintiff by defendant for a farm for the years of 1918 and 1919, plaintiff urging that he is entitled to recover the sum of $578.80 from the defendant as rents. And at the instance of the plaintiff writ of attachment was issued and the crop of rye, which had been grown by the defendant, was attached and sold under the attachment. The affidavit of the attachment filed contained all the ordinary averments of such an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Scott v. Waples-Painter Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Brisley v. MahaffeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Incorporated Town of Comanche v. WorksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Selsor v. ArnbrechtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Maney Bros. & Co. v. BlackburnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. Berch v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Patton v. BullardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API