Ed Hockaday & Co. v. King
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Kingfisher County; A. H. Huston, Judge. Action by Ed Hockaday & Co. against George M. King and Frank King. Judgment 'for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHayes, J.
On July 10, 1908, plaintiff in error, hereinafter designated plaintiff, filed in the district court of Kingfisher county its petition, in which it seeks to recover from the defendants in error, hereinafter designated defendants, $908.74, due upon a book account for goods and merchandise which had been purchased by defendants from plaintiff. On the same date plaintiff filed an affidavit for garnishment, its garnishment undertaking, and a prsecipe for garnishment order and summons, and there was issued a garnishment order or summons, which was served upon the persons named as creditors in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chanute v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
- Orton v. NoonanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
- Thoen v. HarnstromWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- German American Bank v. Butler-Mueller Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
- Lord v. MeachemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Schuman v. McLainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Scott v. Waples-Painter Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Farmers' Nat. Bank v. TennisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- General Supply Co. v. Pinnacle Drilling Fluids, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Hammond Theatrical Co. v. GregoryIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.