Jimenez v. Baglieri
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Per curiam
Plaintiff Jesenia Jimenez was struck and injured by a hit-and-run driver. She sued to recover damages for her injuries and she named the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund as a defendant pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6-78. The Fund moved for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff was subject to the verbal *164threshold, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8a, and that her injuries did not meet the statutory criteria. The motion was denied on the ground that a claim against the Fund by a person injured by a hit-and-run driver is not subject to the verbal threshold.
A trial on the issue of liability only was held on…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pepe v. UrbanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Sumner v. UNSATISFIED CLAIMNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- Cureton v. EleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jimenez v. BaglieriSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- ROXANNE E. LLOYD VS. BRIAN E. LLOYD (FM-06-0012-15, CUMBERLAND COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018