Legal Opinion

Jimenez v. Baglieri

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 18, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff Jesenia Jimenez was struck and injured by a hit-and-run driver. She sued to recover damages for her injuries and she named the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund as a defendant pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6-78. The Fund moved for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff was subject to the verbal *164threshold, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8a, and that her injuries did not meet the statutory criteria. The motion was denied on the ground that a claim against the Fund by a person injured by a hit-and-run driver is not subject to the verbal threshold.

A trial on the issue of liability only was held on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pepe v. UrbanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  2. Sumner v. UNSATISFIED CLAIMNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
  3. Cureton v. EleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jimenez v. BaglieriSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  2. ROXANNE E. LLOYD VS. BRIAN E. LLOYD (FM-06-0012-15, CUMBERLAND COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API