Legal Opinion
Pepe v. Urban
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 16, 1951PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
11 N.J. Super. 385 (1951)
78 A.2d 406
CATHERINE PEPE AND ANOTHER, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
STEVE URBAN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 2, 1951.
Decided January 16, 1951.
Before Judges JACOBS, EASTWOOD and BIGELOW.
Mr. Harry Chashin argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Marcus & Levy and Hyman W. Rosenthal, attorneys).
Mr. Joseph J. DeLuccia argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. A. Leo Bohl, attorney).
The opinion of the court was delivered by BIGELOW, J.A.D.
This appeal is unusual in that no consideration need be given to the facts that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Carlo v. the Okonite-Callender Cable Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Wait v. KrewsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
- Heinz v. Atlantic Stages, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
- Carlo v. Okonite-Callender Cable Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
3Cited by29 opinions
- Klimko v. RoseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Audubon Volunteer Fire Co. v. Church Const. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- Schuttler v. ReinhardtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Zasada v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- In re the Probate of the Alleged Will of MarinusNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.