Legal Opinion
Ohio Co. v. Nemecek
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided May 15, 1995No. 95-CV-71391-DTPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONERS’ MOTION TO DISMISS ARBITRATION CLAIMS AND ENJOIN ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS
HACKETT, District Judge.
The matter before the court is an action by petitioners The Ohio Company (TOC) and Andrew Wilhelm to enjoin respondents (the Nemeceks) from pursuing their claims before the Department of Arbitration of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). Petitioners argue that the Nemeceks’ claims are stale and ineligible for arbitration.
Petitioners have requested that the court enter an order either (1) staying the NYSE proceedings pending a determination of their petition, or (2)…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- PAINEWEBBER INCORPORATED v. Willard S. HARTMANN, Leona R. Hartmann, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Leib v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1978
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,619 Edward D. Jones & Company and Gary Aleff v. Duane Sorrells, Mildred Sorrells and Curt SorrellsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Roney and Company v. Sam Kassab Akram SemaanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- PaineWebber, Inc. v. LandayDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
- The Ohio Company and Andrew J. Wilhelm v. Douglas D. And Isabelle J. NemecekCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- McDonald & Co. Securities, Inc. v. BayerDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1995