Legal Opinion
PaineWebber, Inc. v. Landay
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 21, 1995No. Civ. A. 94-10957-DPWPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WOODLOCK, District Judge.
The plaintiff, PaineWebber, Inc., instituted this action for declaratory and injunctive relief to bar the defendants, Charles M. Landay and Sheila D. Landay (“the Landays”), from seeking arbitration of certain claims against PaineWebber. PaineWebber has moved for a preliminary injunction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 65 to enjoin the Landays from proceeding to arbitration. As grounds for its motion, PaineWebber contends that 1) the Landays’ claims are not eligible for arbitration, 2) the claims are deficient as a matter of law and so not arbitrable, and…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Painewebber Incorporated v. Mohamad S. Elahi, Kokab Moarefi Elahi and Maryam ElahiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Ann F. Cogswell, F/k/a Ann F. Stanton v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. Ben D. TrevorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Prudential Securities, Inc. v. EmersonDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1996
- Bangor Hydro-Electric Co. v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1999
- In re the Arbitration between R.C. Layne Construction, Inc. & Stratton Oakmont, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.