Legal Opinion

In the Interest of A. D.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 28, 2009No. A08A1962PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Judge.

The juvenile court adjudicated 14-year-old A. D. delinquent upon its determination that he had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the felony of aggravated battery. Because A. D. has shown no merit in his sole contention that the evidence was insufficient, we affirm.

When considering the sufficiency of the evidence to support a juvenile court’s adjudication of delinquency, this court applies the standard set forth in Jackson v. Virginia. Thus, we construe the evidence in favor of the juvenile court’s findings and determine whether a rational…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Riley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  3. In the Interest of S. K.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  4. In the Interest of A. M.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jimmerson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
  2. In THE INTEREST OF T.B., a ChildSupreme Court of Georgia · 2022
  3. Hill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  4. Whitley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  5. In the Interest of B. B.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API