Legal Opinion

McHenry v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided October 6, 1992No. 05-90-00834-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REMAND

BAKER, Justice.

On original submission, we affirmed appellant’s conviction for conspiracy to possess a controlled substance. See McHenry v. State, 823 S.W.2d 667 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1991), rev’d, 829 S.W.2d 803 (Tex.Crim.App.1992). In doing so, we rejected appellant’s argument that the court’s order amending the indictment was not effective to amend the original indictment. McHenry, 823 S.W.2d at 671. We also held that the evidence was sufficient for the jury to find the elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. McHenry, 823 S.W.2d at 672.

Appellant petitioned the Texas…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Turner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Benson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  3. Garrett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Blankenship v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Westfall v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1998
  2. Hilton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Flowers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  4. McHenry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  5. McHenry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API