McKenzie v. C. F. Hathaway Co.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTS, Justice.
Virginia McKenzie appeals from the pro forma decree affirming the denial of her petition for workers’ compensation. Her petition sought compensation for an occupational disease, 1 namely emphysema and chronic bronchitis, allegedly caused or aggravated by dust in the atmosphere in defendant Hathaway’s plant. The Commissioner rejected her claim. McKenzie argues on appeal that there was no competent evidence to support the denial of her petition. 2 We affirm the judgment.
The Commissioner made the following findings:
Virginia McKenzie who had been employed by C. F. Hathaway…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moreau v. Zayre Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- MacLeod v. Great Northern Paper CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
- Smith v. Dexter Oil Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Robbins v. Bates Fabrics, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Black v. Black Bros. ConstructionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dunton v. Eastern Fine Paper CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Mathieu v. Bath Iron WorksSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- Bruton v. City of BathSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Upham v. Van Baalen Pacific Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Brawn v. St. Regis Paper Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.