Brawn v. St. Regis Paper Co.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
CARTER, Justice.
Harold Brawn appeals from the pro for-ma decree affirming the denial by the Workers’ Compensation Commission of his petition for compensation for an occupational disease. We affirm the judgment.
Brawn’s petition sought compensation for emphysema allegedly caused by inhaling paper dust during his thirty-eight years of employment in the mill of the respondent, St. Regis Paper Company. The Commission denied the petition and found:
Harold S. Brawn suffers from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease which probably is a combination of asthma and emphysema. The etiology of this…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dunton v. Eastern Fine Paper CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- McKenzie v. C. F. Hathaway Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bryant v. Masters MacHine Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Bruton v. City of BathSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- LaCroix v. New England Group Maremont Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Costa v. FoodlinerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981